Ongoing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and All-Cause Mortality at Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Change

Author:

Yuyun Matthew F.123ORCID,Erqou Sebhat A.45ORCID,Peralta Adelqui O.123ORCID,Hoffmeister Peter S.123ORCID,Yarmohammadi Hirad6ORCID,Echouffo-Tcheugui Justin B.7ORCID,Martin David T.28ORCID,Joseph Jacob128ORCID,Singh Jagmeet P.29

Affiliation:

1. VA Boston Healthcare System (M.F.Y., A.O.P., P.S.H., J.J.), MA.

2. Harvard Medical School (M.F.Y., A.O.P., P.S.H., D.T.M., J.J., J.P.S.), MA.

3. Boston University School of Medicine (M.F.Y., A.O.P., P.S.H.), MA.

4. Brown University (S.A.E.), RI.

5. Providence VA Medical Center (S.A.E.), RI.

6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York (H.Y.).

7. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (J.B.E.T.).

8. Brigham and Women’s Hospital (D.T.M., J.J.), Boston.

9. Massachusetts General Hospital (J.P.S.), Boston.

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty still surrounds implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator change at time of elective replacement indicator, in primary prevention patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) beyond guideline recommendations or without prior appropriate ICD therapies. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies assessing the risk of appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality after generator change in patients with improved LVEF>35% versus unimproved LVEF≤35% or patients without versus with prior appropriate ICD therapies during the life of their first ICD generator. A systematic electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until December 31, 2019 was performed. Estimates were combined using random-effects model meta-analyses. Results: In 15 studies that included 29 730 patients, 25.3% had LVEF improvement >35% at time of generator change. The pooled annual incidence of appropriate ICD therapies was significantly lower in those with improved LVEF, compared with patients with unimproved LVEF: 4.6% versus 10.7%; risk ratio, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.36–0.68), P <0.0001. The pooled rate of all-cause mortality was 6.6% versus 10.9% per year, risk ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.62–0.69), P <0.0001. Risk of inappropriate shock was comparable between the 2 groups ( P =0.750). In 8 studies (N=27 209), the pooled incidence of ventricular arrhythmia was significantly lower in patients without prior ICD therapies (3.9% per annum), compared with those with prior ICD therapies (12.5 % per annum), risk ratio of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.33–0.41), P <0.001. Conclusions: There was significant reduction in risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients with improved versus unimproved LVEF or those who received versus those who did not receive appropriate ICD therapies during the life of their first ICD generator. However, we found a substantial residual outcome risk in these groups of patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3