Risk of ventricular arrhythmias following implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator generator change in patients with recovered ejection fraction: Implications for shared decision‐making

Author:

Chang Donald D.1ORCID,Pantlin Peter G.2ORCID,Benn Francis A.2,Ryan Gullatt T.2,Bernard Michael L.2,Elise Hiltbold A.2,Khatib Sammy2,Polin Glenn M.2,Rogers Paul A.2,Velasco‐Gonzalez Cruz3,Morin Daniel P.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Queensland–Ochsner Clinical School New Orleans Louisiana USA

2. Department of Cardiology, Division of Electrophysiology Ochsner Medical Center Louisiana New Orleans USA

3. Ochsner Health Center for Outcomes and Health Services Research New Orleans Louisiana USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionGuidelines indicate primary‐prevention implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) for most patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. Some patients' LVEFs improve during the life of their first ICD. In patients with recovered LVEF who never received appropriate ICD therapy, the utility of generator replacement upon battery depletion remains unclear. Here, we evaluate ICD therapy based on LVEF at the time of generator change, to educate shared decision‐making regarding whether to replace the depleted ICD.MethodsWe followed patients with a primary‐prevention ICD who underwent generator change. Patients who received appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) before generator change were excluded. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapy, adjusted for the competing risk of death.ResultsAmong 951 generator changes, 423 met inclusion criteria. During 3.4 ± 2.2 years follow‐up, 78 (18%) received appropriate therapy for VT/VF. Compared to patients with recovered LVEF > 35% (n = 161 [38%]), those with LVEF ≤ 35% (n = 262 [62%]) were more likely to require ICD therapy (p = .002; Fine‐Gray adjusted 5‐year event rates: 12.7% vs. 25.0%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the optimal LVEF cutoff for VT/VF prediction to be 45%, the use of which further improved risk stratification (p < .001), with Fine‐Gray adjusted 5‐year rates 6.2% versus 25.1%.ConclusionFollowing ICD generator change, patients with primary‐prevention ICDs and recovered LVEF have significantly lower risk of subsequent ventricular arrhythmias compared to those with persistent LVEF depression. Risk stratification at LVEF 45% offers significant additional negative predictive value over a 35% cutoff, without a significant loss in sensitivity. These data may be useful during shared decision‐making at the time of ICD generator battery depletion.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3