Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community

Author:

Spetko Nicholas1ORCID,Rong Jian2,Larson Martin G.23,Haidar Michael4ORCID,Raber Inbar1,Peters Kevin1,Benjamin Emelia J.25ORCID,O'Donnell Christopher J.6ORCID,Manning Warren J.17,Vasan Ramachandran S.25ORCID,Mitchell Gary F.8ORCID,Tsao Connie W.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston MA

2. Boston University and National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute’s Framingham Heart Study Framingham MA

3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics Boston University Boston MA

4. Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA

5. Sections of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiology, Department of Medicine Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA

6. Department of Medicine, Cardiology Section, VA Boston Healthcare System, and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School West Roxbury MA

7. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston MA

8. Cardiovascular Engineering Inc. Norwood MA

Abstract

Background Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)–vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community‐based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and several clinical measures of LV diastolic mechanics. Methods and Results Framingham Heart Study Offspring adults (n=1502 participants, mean 67±9 years, 54% women) with available 1.5T CMR and transthoracic echocardiographic measures were included. Measures included proximal descending aortic strain and aortic arch pulse wave velocity by CMR (2002–2006) and diastolic function (mitral Doppler E and A wave velocity, E wave area, and LV tissue Doppler e' velocity) by echocardiography (2005–2008). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to relate CMR aortic stiffness measures to measures of echocardiographic LV diastolic function. All continuous variables were standardized. In multivariable‐adjusted regression analyses, aortic strain was inversely associated with E wave deceleration time (estimated β=−0.10±0.032, P =0.001), whereas aortic arch pulse wave velocity was inversely associated with E/A ratio (estimated β=−0.094±0.027, P =0.0006), E wave area (estimated β=−0.070±0.027, P =0.010), and e' (estimated β=−0.061±0.027, P =0.022), all indicating associations of higher aortic stiffness by CMR with less favorable LV diastolic function. Compared with men, women had a larger inverse relationship between pulse wave velocity and E/A ratio (interaction β=−0.085±0.031, P =0.0064). There was no significant effect modification by age or a U‐shaped (quadratic) relation between aortic stiffness and LV diastolic function measures. Conclusions Higher proximal aortic stiffness is associated with less favorable LV diastolic function. Future studies may clarify temporal relations of aortic stiffness with varying patterns and progression of LV diastolic dysfunction.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3