Prior Myocardial Infarction and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes ‐ A Post‐hoc Analysis of the ISAR‐REACT 5 Trial

Author:

Lahu Shqipdona12ORCID,Scalamogna Maria13ORCID,Ndrepepa Gjin1,Menichelli Maurizio4,Valina Christian5,Hemetsberger Rayyan6ORCID,Witzenbichler Bernhard7ORCID,Bernlochner Isabell28ORCID,Joner Michael12ORCID,Xhepa Erion1ORCID,Hapfelmeier Alexander910ORCID,Kufner Sebastian1ORCID,Sager Hendrik B.12ORCID,Mayer Katharina1ORCID,Kessler Thorsten12ORCID,Laugwitz Karl‐Ludwig28ORCID,Richardt Gert6,Schunkert Heribert12ORCID,Neumann Franz‐Josef5ORCID,Kastrati Adnan12ORCID,Cassese Salvatore1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Klinik für Herz‐ und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technische Universität München Munich Germany

2. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance Munich Germany

3. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy

4. Ospedale Fabrizio Spaziani, Cardiology Frosinone Italy

5. Department of Cardiology and Angiology II University Heart Center Freiburg ‐ Bad Krozingen, Standort Bad Krozingen Bad Krozingen Germany

6. Heart Center Bad Segeberg, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg Bad Segeberg Germany

7. Helios Amper‐Klinikum Dachau, Cardiology & Pneumology Dachau Germany

8. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Innere Medizin I (Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pneumologie), Klinikum rechts der Isar Munich Germany

9. Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine Institute of AI and Informatics in Medicine Munich Germany

10. Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research Munich Germany

Abstract

Background The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior myocardial infarction (MI) remain unstudied. We aimed to assess the treatment effect of ticagrelor versus prasugrel according to prior MI status in patients with ACS. Methods and Results Patients with acute coronary syndrome planned for an invasive strategy and randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel in the ISAR‐REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial were included. The primary end point was the composite of 1‐year all‐cause death, MI, or stroke; the secondary safety end point was the composite of 1‐year Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 to 5 bleeding. The study included 4015 patients (prior MI=631 patients; no prior MI=3384 patients). As compared with patients without prior MI, the primary end point occurred more frequently in patients with prior MI (12.6% versus 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.38–2.29]); the secondary safety end point appears to differ little between patients with and without prior MI (5.8% versus 5.7%, respectively; HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.71–1.45]). With regard to the primary end point, ticagrelor versus prasugrel was associated with an HR of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.03–2.55) in patients with prior MI and an HR of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.99–1.65) in patients without prior MI ( P int =0.37). With regard to the secondary safety end point, ticagrelor versus prasugrel was associated with an HR of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.56–2.91) in patients with prior MI and an HR of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.82–1.55) in patients without prior MI ( P int =0.79). Conclusions Patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior MI are at higher risk for recurrent ischemic but not bleeding events. Prasugrel is superior to ticagrelor in reducing the risk of ischemic events without a tradeoff in bleeding regardless of prior MI status. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01944800.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3