Coronary Artery Calcium Score to Refine the Use of PCSK9i in Asymptomatic Individuals: A Multicohort Study

Author:

Cainzos‐Achirica Miguel123ORCID,Quispe Renato3,Mszar Reed4ORCID,Dudum Ramzi5,Al Rifai Mahmoud6ORCID,Erbel Raimund7,Stang Andreas78,Jöckel Karl‐Heinz7,Lehmann Nils7ORCID,Schramm Sara7ORCID,Schmidt Börge7,Toth Peter P.3910ORCID,Rana Jamal S.11,Lima Joao A. C.12ORCID,Doria de Vasconcellos Henrique12ORCID,Lloyd‐Jones Donald13ORCID,Joshi Parag H.14ORCID,Ayers Colby14ORCID,Khera Amit14ORCID,Blaha Michael J.315ORCID,Greenland Philip13ORCID,Nasir Khurram123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Department of Cardiology Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center Houston TX

2. Center for Outcomes Research Houston Methodist Houston TX

3. Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore MD

4. Center for Outcomes Research Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT

5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA

6. Section of Cardiology Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX

7. Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen University Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany

8. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health Boston University Boston MA

9. CGH Medical Center Sterling IL

10. University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria IL

11. Divisions of Cardiology and Research Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland CA

12. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore MD

13. Departments of Preventive Medicine and Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL

14. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX

15. Department of Epidemiology and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD

Abstract

Background The value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in the allocation of PCSK9i (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors) among individuals without clinically evident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is unknown for indications that do not require confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia. We aimed to assess the ability of CAC to stratify ASCVD risk under 3 non–familial hypercholesterolemia PCSK9i allocation paradigms. Methods and Results We included participants without clinically evident ASCVD from MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) study, DHS (Dallas Heart Study), and HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) study. Three PCSK9i eligibility scenarios were defined: a broad scenario informed only by high low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (N=567), a restrictive one combining higher low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and presence of ≥2 additional risk factors (N=127), and a high‐risk scenario where individuals with subclinical organ damage or high estimated risk would be treated to achieve low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <55 mg/dL (N=471). The high‐risk scenario had the highest ASCVD event rates (27.8% at 10 years). CAC=0 was observed in 35% participants in the broad scenario, 25% in the restrictive scenario, and 16% in the high‐risk scenario. In all, CAC=0 was associated with the lowest incident ASCVD rates at 5 and 10 years, and CAC burden was independently associated with ASCVD events adjusting for traditional risk factors. Conclusions CAC may be used to refine the allocation of PCSK9i, potentially leading to a more conservative use if CAC=0. The value of CAC testing is greater in scenarios that use low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and/or traditional risk factors to define PCSK9i eligibility (CAC=0 present in 1 of 3–4 patients), whereas its prevalence is lower when allocation is informed by presence of noncoronary subclinical organ damage.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3