Faculty Development Approaches for Life Support Courses: A Scoping Review

Author:

Ko Ying‐Chih1,Hsieh Ming‐Ju1ORCID,Cheng Adam2,Lauridsen Kasper G.345,Sawyer Taylor L.67,Bhanji Farhan8,Greif Robert910ORCID,Bray Janet,Breckwoldt Jan,Duff Jonathan P,Eastwood Kathryn,Gilfoyle Elaine,Lin Yiqun,Lockey Andrew,Matsuyama Tasuku,Nation Kevin,Patocka Catherine,Pellegrino Jeffrey L,Schnaubelt Sebastian,Yang Chih‐Wei,Yeung Joyce,Finn Judith

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei Taiwan

2. Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine University of Calgary Alberta Canada

3. Research Center for Emergency Medicine Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

4. Emergency Department Randers Regional Hospital Randers Denmark

5. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA

6. University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle WA

7. Seattle Children’s Hospital Seattle WA

8. Department of Pediatrics McGill University Montreal Canada

9. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine Bern University HospitalUniversity of Bern Bern Switzerland

10. School of Medicine Sigmund Freud University Vienna Vienna Austria

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review initiated by the Education, Implementation and Teams Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation was to identify faculty development approaches to improve instructional competence in accredited life support courses. We searched PubMed, Ovid Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies published from January 1, 1966 to December 31, 2021 on approaches to improve faculty development for life support courses. Data on participant characteristics, interventions, design, and outcomes of included studies were extracted. Of the initially identified 10 310 studies, we included 20 studies (5 conference abstracts, 1 short communication, 14 full‐length articles). Among them, 12 studies aimed to improve instructors/candidates’ teaching ability in basic life support courses. A wide variety of interventions were identified. The interventions were categorized into 4 themes: instructor qualification/training (n=9), assessment tools (n=3), teaching skills enhancement (n=3), and additional courses for instructors (n=5). Most studies showed that these interventions improved specific teaching ability or confidence of the instructors and learning outcomes in different kinds of life support courses. However, no studies addressed clinical outcomes of patients. In conclusion, the faculty development approaches for instructors are generally associated with improved learning outcomes for participants, and also improved teaching ability and self‐confidence of the instructors. It is encouraged that local organizations implement faculty development programs for their teaching staff of their accredited resuscitation courses. Further studies should explore the best ways to strengthen and maintain instructor competency, and define the cost‐effectiveness of various different faculty development strategies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3