Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Author:

Aufderheide Tom P.1,Sigurdsson Gardar1,Pirrallo Ronald G.1,Yannopoulos Demetris1,McKnite Scott1,von Briesen Chris1,Sparks Christopher W.1,Conrad Craig J.1,Provo Terry A.1,Lurie Keith G.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (T.P.A., R.G.P., C.J.C.); Advanced Circulatory Systems, Inc, Eden Prairie, Minn (C.v.B., C.W.S., T.A.P., K.G.L.); and the Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Departments of Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (G.S., D.Y., S.M.).

Abstract

Background— A clinical observational study revealed that rescuers consistently hyperventilated patients during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of excessive ventilation in humans and determine if comparable excessive ventilation rates during CPR in animals significantly decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival. Methods and Results— In humans, ventilation rate and duration during CPR was electronically recorded by professional rescuers. In 13 consecutive adults (average age, 63±5.8 years) receiving CPR (7 men), average ventilation rate was 30±3.2 per minute (range, 15 to 49). Average duration per breath was 1.0±0.07 per second. No patient survived. Hemodynamics were studied in 9 pigs in cardiac arrest ventilated in random order with 12, 20, or 30 breaths per minute. Survival rates were then studied in 3 groups of 7 pigs in cardiac arrest that were ventilated at 12 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), 30 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), or 30 breaths per minute (5% CO 2 /95% O 2 ). In animals treated with 12, 20, and 30 breaths per minute, the mean intrathoracic pressure (mm Hg/min) and coronary perfusion pressure (mm Hg) were 7.1±0.7, 11.6±0.7, 17.5±1.0 ( P <0.0001), and 23.4±1.0, 19.5±1.8, and 16.9±1.8 ( P =0.03), respectively. Survival rates were 6/7, 1/7, and 1/7 with 12, 30, and 30+ CO 2 breaths per minute, respectively ( P =0.006). Conclusions— Professional rescuers were observed to excessively ventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR. Subsequent animal studies demonstrated that similar excessive ventilation rates resulted in significantly increased intrathoracic pressure and markedly decreased coronary perfusion pressures and survival rates.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3