Affiliation:
1. GAZI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, DEPARTMENT OF SPORTS, DEPARTMENT OF SPORT MANAGEMENT
2. GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
3. VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BEDEN EĞİTİMİ VE SPOR YÜKSEKOKULU
Abstract
The aim of this research was, to develop a valid and reliable tool that intended to measure the perceptions of football fans, related with the quality of sports events. Participants of the study was determined by criterion sampling, that is one of the purposeful sampling methods. Our first criteria for participants of this research was, to be a fans' of a team in the Super League on 2021-2022 season, and our second criteria was, to attend the events twice in their team's stadiums, as a spectator on the same season. Totally 599 volunteer participants were involved in this study. Data from 361 participants were used for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and data from 238 participants were used for Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Findings of EFA were demonstrated a structure with 10 factors, and factor loads of items in these factors were between .46 and .96. And CFA results displayed that the RMSEA value of the model was .063, and other goodness-of-fit indexes were among acceptable values. Also coefficients of Cronbach's alpha were observed between .821 and .933. These findings revealed that the scale consisted of 42 items, under its 10-dimensional structure and the sports events quality variable of this structure explained a significant variance of 73.23%. These findings revealed that the scale consisted of 42 items, under its 10-dimensional structure and the event quality variable of this structure explained a significant variance of 73.23%. In conclusion, it can be accepted that Sport Event Quality Scale (SEQS) is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish culture.
Reference89 articles.
1. 1. Aaron, C.T.S. ve Stewart, B. (2015). Introduction to sport marketing. New York: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
2. 2. Alexandris, K., Zahariadis, P., Tsorbatzoudis, C. ve Grouios, G. (2004). An empirical investigation of the relationships among service quality, customer satisfaction and psychological commitment in a health club context. European Sport Management Quarterly, 4, 36-52.
3. 3. Armbrecht, J. ve Andersson T. D. (2020). The event experience, hedonic and eudaimonic satisfaction and subjective well-being among sport event participants, Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 12(3), 457-477. DOI:10.1080/19407963. 2019.1695346
4. 4. Atalı, L. ve Sekban, G. (2018). Buz Hokeyi Dünya Şampiyonası seyircilerinin etkinliğe yönelik kalite algısı (U18-DIV III-Group B-Türkiye-2014). Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (KOSBED), 35, 193-206.
5. 5. Berry, L. L., Zeithalm, V. A. ve Parasuraman, A. (1985). Quality counts in services, too. Business Horizons, 28(3), 44-52.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献