An Evaluation of Retrospective Facebook Content Collection

Author:

Bachl MarkoORCID

Abstract

The content on Facebook pages is obviously subject to changes. However, there is often a considerable time lag between the sampling period and the collection date in studies on public Facebook communication. The present evaluation study aims to assess whether - and if so, how - problematic this common practice is in terms of unavailable content. I investigated whether a sample of content items, which were posted to 408 German political Facebook pages in March 2017, could be retrospectively collected in June 2017, September 2017, and March 2018. 27% of the 132,068 test items were no longer accessible after 12 months. The deletion of complete pages was rare, but some prominent pages were not available retrospectively. Posts by the pages themselves were far more likely to be available compared to content, which was posted by private accounts to the pages. There were only small differences between the political parties, but there was substantial variation between the distinct pages. I conclude with a discussion of implications for single research projects (applying timely data collection whenever possible) and for communication research and related disciplines (considering institutionalized data collection efforts).

Publisher

Center for Open Science

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3