A Team-Based Early Action Protocol to Address Ethical Concerns in the Intensive Care Unit

Author:

Pavlish Carol L.1,Henriksen Joan2,Brown-Saltzman Katherine3,Robinson Ellen M.4,Warda Umme Shefa5,Farra Christopher6,Chen Belinda7,Jakel Patricia8

Affiliation:

1. Carol L. Pavlish is an associate professor,

2. Joan Henriksen was the coordinator, Clinical Ethics Consultation Service, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; she is now senior staff ethicist at Children’s Minnesota in Minneapolis.

3. Katherine Brown-Saltzman is a codirector, Ethics Center, and

4. Ellen M. Robinson is a nurse ethicist, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

5. Umme Shefa Warda is a senior statistician,

6. Christopher Farra is a research assistant, and

7. Belinda Chen is a statistician, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Nursing, Los Angeles, California.

8. Patricia Jakel is a clinical nurse specialist, Santa Monica Hospital, University of California, Los Angeles, Health System, Los Angeles, California.

Abstract

Background Ethical conflicts complicate clinical practice and often compromise communication and teamwork among patients, families, and clinicians. As ethical conflicts escalate, patient and family distress and dissatisfaction with care increase and trust in clinicians erodes, reducing care quality and patient safety. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a proactive, team-based ethics protocol used routinely to discuss ethics-related concerns, goals of care, and additional supports for patients and families. Methods In a pre-post intervention study in 6 intensive care units (ICUs) at 3 academic medical centers, the electronic medical records of 1649 patients representing 1712 ICU admissions were studied. Number and timing of family conferences, code discussions with the patient or surrogate, and ethics consultations; palliative care, social work, and chaplain referrals; and ICU length of stay were measured. Preintervention outcomes were compared with outcomes 3 and 6 months after the intervention via multivariate logistic regression controlled for patient variables. Results The odds of receiving a family conference and a chaplain visit were significantly higher after the intervention than at baseline. The number of palliative care consultations and code discussions increased slightly at 3 and 6 months. Social work consultations increased only at 6 months. Ethics consultations increased at both postintervention time points. Length of ICU stay did not change. Conclusions When health care teams were encouraged to communicate routinely about goals of care, more patients received needed support and communication barriers were reduced.

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care Nursing,General Medicine

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3