Accuracy of drawing coagulation samples from heparinized arterial lines

Author:

Templin K,Shively M,Riley J

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time studies when samples are drawn through heparinized arterial lines. METHODS: A total sample of 90 grouped blood samples (from 30 subjects) was used. Patients were all male, with a mean age of 65 and were studied within 24 hours of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Each patient had three venous control and arterial line sample sets (a total of 90 blood samples) drawn when routinely ordered for monitoring therapy. For the arterial line sample, a discard volume of the deadspace, deadspace + 2 mL, or deadspace + 4 mL was randomly assigned for each sample. The venous control volumes were the same for all three sample sets. RESULTS: A 2 x 3 repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the results. The independent variables were the source of the sample (venous vs arterial) and the discard volume of arterial blood (deadspace, deadspace + 2 mL, deadspace + 4 mL). The dependent variables were the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time values. Mean arterial activated partial thromboplastin time values were significantly higher than the corresponding venous values. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time values were not significantly different among the discard volumes of blood drawn. However, there was a significant source by volume interaction. Tukey post-hoc comparisons of venous-arterial activated partial thromboplastin time differences among the three volumes showed significant differences between deadspace volume and deadspace + 2 mL, and deadspace volume and deadspace + 4 mL. There was no significant difference between deadspace + 2 mL and deadspace + 4 mL volumes. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that the minimal amount of discard volume for accurate activated partial thromboplastin time values in this population of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty patients was the catheter deadspace volume plus 2 mL (total 3.6 mL).

Publisher

AACN Publishing

Subject

Critical Care,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3