Political discourse on abortion in Brazil’s Parliament: the invisibility of women's rights

Author:

Budó Marília De Nardin, ,Rodrigues Carla Cristina,Gindri Eduarda Toscani, ,

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the content analysis of 25 bills that went through the Brazilian National Congress between 2015 and 2018 on the theme of criminalization and decriminalization of abortion. The objective is to describe and discuss the arguments used by the parliamentarians to support or reprove those bills. The analysis reveals that women’s reproductive rights are not protagonist of the discourse presented in the bills, which focus on the natural status of the fetus and on increasing penalties to the women who perform self-induced abortion. Even if the religious discourse is not so explicit, we can find many traces of it, though disguised behind a definition of the beginning of human life, to demarcate in time the recognition of the fetus as a subject of rights.

Publisher

Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Subject

Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference63 articles.

1. Aldana, M., 2008. Vozes católicas no congresso. Estudos Feministas [online], 16(2), pp. 639-646. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2008000200018 [Accessed 30 November 2020].

2. Alves, J.E.D., 2006. As políticas populacionais e o planejamento familiar na América Latina e no Brasil. Textos para discussão [online], nº 17. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Nacional de Ciências Estatísticas. Available from: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv31808.pdf [Accessed 30 November 2020].

3. Alves, J.E.D., 2018. O voto evangélico garantiu a eleição de Jair Bolsonaro. Ecodebate [online], 31 outubro. Available from: https://www.ecodebate.com.br/2018/10/31/o-voto-evangelico-garantiu-a-eleicao-de-jair-bolsonaro-artigo-de-jose-eustaquio-diniz-alves/ [Accessed 30 November 2020].

4. Bardin, L., 2011. Análise de conteúdo. Lisbon: Edições 70.

5. Biroli, F., 2014. Autonomia e justiça no debate sobre aborto: implicações teóricas e políticas. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política [online], nº 15, pp. 37-68. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220141503 [Accessed 30 November 2020].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3