Abstract
Study purpose. The increasing amount of research in Exercise and Sport Sciences emphasized the use of increasingly heuristic statistical tools appropriate to the aim in terms of qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative-quantitative data. Often, a lack of knowledge of statistical tools and their appropriateness for data analysis, especially between the use of parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques, is encountered by researchers. This requires the indispensable use of statistical experts, who, for the comprehensive understanding of the research design, need the use of human and economic resources that could probably be used differently and more efficiently. The aim of this study was to provide a list of the most used statistical methods in Exercise and Sport Sciences, focusing on the distinction between parametric and non-parametric statistical processing for both quantitative and qualitative research.
Materials and methods. The method was the literature review with argumentative elaborations concerning the validity of the use of the statistical tools.
Results. A total of 22 statistical tools, both parametric and non-parametric, were found: 5 useful to test relationship, 7 to compare two groups and 10 to compare two or more groups. For each statistical tool, a scientific paper related to Exercise and Sport Sciences was collected.
Conclusions. These data allow developing potential guidelines, applying to Exercise and Sport Sciences, for the rigorous model of research projects with a systematic use of statistical processing in the complete hypothesis of the study.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Health (social science)
Reference40 articles.
1. Rojas-Valverde, D., Pino-Ortega, J., Gómez-Carmona, C. D., & Rico-González, M. (2020). A systematic review of methods and criteria standard proposal for the use of principal component analysis in team’s sports science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8712. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238712
2. Sainani, K., & Chamari, K. (2022). Wish list for improving the quality of statistics in sport science. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 17(5), 673-674. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2022-0023
3. Altman, D. G. (2002). Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? Jama, 287(21), 2765-2767. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2765
4. Schroter, S., Black, N., Evans, S., Godlee, F., Osorio, L., & Smith, R. (2008). What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(10), 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062
5. Kamuk, Y. U. (2020). Analysis of the statistical methods used in scientific papers in the field of sports sciences. SPORMETRE The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 18(3), 73-85.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献