Evaluation of hearing loss in young adults after exposure to 3.0T MRI with standard hearing protection

Author:

Carr Carrie M1ORCID,Lane John I1ORCID,Eckel Larry J1,Diehn Felix E1ORCID,Kallmes Dave F1,Carlson Matthew L2,Shu Yunhong3ORCID,Bernstein Matt A3,Gunderson Tina M4ORCID,Poling Gayla L2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

2. Division of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

3. Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

4. Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

Abstract

Standard clinical protocols require hearing protection during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patient safety. This investigation prospectively evaluated the auditory function impact of acoustic noise exposure during a 3.0T MRI in healthy adults. Twenty-nine participants with normal hearing underwent a comprehensive audiologic assessment before and immediately following a clinically indicated head MRI. Appropriate hearing protection with earplugs (and pads) was used per standard of practice. To characterize noise hazards, current sound monitoring tools were used to measure levels of pulse sequences measured. A third audiologic test was performed if a significant threshold shift (STS) was identified at the second test, within 30 days post MRI. Some sequences produced high levels (up to 114.5 dBA; 129 dB peak SPL) that required hearing protection but did not exceed 100% daily noise dose. One participant exhibited an STS in the frequency region most highly associated with noise-induced hearing loss. No participants experienced OSHA-defined STS in either ear. Overall, OAE measures did not show evidence of changes in cochlear function after MRI. In conclusion, hearing threshold shifts associated with hearing loss or OAE level shifts reflecting underlying cochlear damage were not detected in any of the 3.0T MRI study participants who used the current recommended hearing protection.

Funder

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

Publisher

Acoustical Society of America (ASA)

Subject

Acoustics and Ultrasonics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Reference31 articles.

1. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013

2. ACR (2021). “ Large and medium phantom test guidance,” ACR Accreditation, pp. 1–39, https://www.acraccreditation.org/modalities/mri (Last viewed March 14, 2022).

3. High-frequency (10-18 kHz) hearing thresholds: reliability, and effects of age and occupational noise exposure

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3‐T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection;Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging;2024-05-22

2. Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools;The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America;2023-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3