Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3‐T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection

Author:

Jin Chao12,Zhao Huifang12,Li Huan12,Chen Peiyao12,Tian Cong12,Li Xianjun12,Wang Miaomiao12,Liu Congcong12,Sun Qinli12,Zheng Jie12,Li Baiya3,Zhou Xihui4,Salvi Richard5,Yang Jian12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China

2. Shaanxi Engineering Research Center of Computational Imaging and Medical Intelligence Xi'an Shaanxi China

3. Department of Head‐Neck‐Otolaryngology The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China

4. Department of Pediatrics The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China

5. Center for Hearing and Deafness, University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA

Abstract

BackgroundNeonates with immature auditory function (eg, weak/absent middle ear muscle reflex) could conceivably be vulnerable to noise‐induced hearing loss; however, it is unclear if neonates show evidence of hearing loss following MRI acoustic noise exposure.PurposeTo explore the auditory effects of MRI acoustic noise in neonates.Study TypeProspective.SubjectsTwo independent cohorts of neonates (N = 19 and N = 18; mean gestational‐age, 38.75 ± 2.18 and 39.01 ± 1.83 weeks).Field Strength/SequenceT1‐weighted three‐dimensional gradient‐echo sequence, T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo sequence, single‐shot echo‐planar imaging‐based diffusion‐tensor imaging, single‐shot echo‐planar imaging‐based diffusion‐kurtosis imaging and T2‐weighted fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery sequence at 3.0 T.AssessmentAll neonates wore ear protection during scan protocols lasted ~40 minutes. Equivalent sound pressure levels (SPLs) were measured for both cohorts. In cohort1, left‐ and right‐ear auditory brainstem response (ABR) was measured before (baseline) and after (follow‐up) MRI, included assessment of ABR threshold, wave I, III and V latencies and interpeak interval to determine the functional status of auditory nerve and brainstem. In cohort2, baseline and follow‐up left‐ and right‐ear distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes were assessed at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz to determine cochlear function.Statistical TestWilcoxon signed‐rank or paired t‐tests with Bonferroni's correction were used to compare the differences between baseline and follow‐up ABR and DPOAE measures.ResultsEquivalent SPLs ranged from 103.5 to 113.6 dBA. No significant differences between baseline and follow‐up were detected in left‐ or right‐ear ABR measures (P > 0.999, Bonferroni corrected) in cohort1, or in DPOAE levels at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz in cohort2 (all P > 0.999 Bonferroni corrected except for left‐ear levels at 3.5 and 7.0 kHz with corrected P = 0.138 and P = 0.533).Data ConclusionA single 40‐minute 3‐T MRI with equivalent SPLs of 103.5–113.6 dBA did not result in significant transient disruption of auditory function, as measured by ABR and DPOAE, in neonates with adequate hearing protection.Evidence Level2.Technical EfficacyStage 5.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3