Evaluation of reliability indicators of shock absorbers struts of M1 category cars in conditions of violation of established market relations between end users of spare parts and suppliers

Abstract

Introduction. Over the past two years, there has been a violation of established market relations between end users of spare parts and suppliers. This led, on the one hand, to a significant increase in the cost of automotive components, and, on the other, to a reorientation of the market to new alternative manufacturers and suppliers. The main purpose of the work was a statistical assessment of the reliability indicators of the most expensive suspension element – the McPherson suspension strut, in the conditions of replacing the original struts with analogues available on the market.Methods. The study of the operational reliability of systems, components and assemblies of M1 cars was conducted in a dealership during 2022-2023. The study mainly involved cars with a sedan body and a McPherson front suspension. At the same time, the reason for contacting the service, the mileage of the car, as well as the types of work performed were recorded in each work order. The experimental data were processed using MSExcel and MatLab software from MathWorks.Resultsand conclusions. The conducted research allowed us to conclude that the appeals on the suspension of the car are almost twice as high as other appeals. The most expensive elements – the front shock struts, account for up to a third of all suspension failures. To assess the reliability indicators of alternative racks, the failure distribution law (normal), the probability of failure and uptime are determined, and the parameters of the distribution law are determined: mathematical expectation, standard deviation and coefficient of variation. It was found that the resource of the rear shock absorbers is at least 30% more, and there are significantly fewer calls at the service station. Thus, the operation of a car with racks from alternative manufacturers is quite reasonable, despite the fact that the resource of racks from alternative manufacturers is usually lower than that of the original brands.