Affiliation:
1. University of Kentucky
Abstract
SYNOPSIS
Leveraging accounting scholars' expertise in the integrity of information and evidence, and in managers' self-interested discretion in information collection and reporting, offers the possibility of accounting scholars creating, promoting, and adapting methods to ensure that accounting research is of exemplary integrity and quality. This manuscript uses the six principles from the recent American Statistical Association (ASA) report on p-values as an organizing framework, and considers some implications of these principles for quantitative accounting research. It also proposes 12 actions, in three categories (community actions, redefining research quality, and ranking academic accounting journals) for improving quantitative accounting research quality and integrity. It concludes with a clarion call to our community to create, adopt, and promote scholarship practices and policies that lead in scholarly integrity.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference73 articles.
1. A model of individual accounting faculty salaries;Almer;Issues in Accounting Education,2013
2. Arbinger Institute. 2010. Leadership and Self-Deception: Getting Out of the Box. 2nd edition. A BK Life Book. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
3. Psychopathy, academic accountants' attitudes toward unethical research practices, and publication success;Bailey;The Accounting Review,2015
4. Research misconduct in accounting literature: A survey of the most prolific researchers' actions and beliefs;Bailey;Abacus,2001
5. Barrick, J. A.,
N. W. Mecham,
S. L. Summers, and D. A. Wood.
2017. Ranking Accounting Journals by Topical Area and Methodology. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2848560
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献