Do We Matter? Attention the General Public, Policymakers, and Academics Give to Accounting Research

Author:

Burton F. Greg1ORCID,Summers Scott L.1ORCID,Wilks T. Jeffrey1ORCID,Wood David A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Brigham Young University

Abstract

ABSTRACT Many question the value of accounting scholarship to society. We compare the attention the general public, policymakers, and academics give to academic accounting research relative to other business disciplines and other more general disciplines (economics, psychology, and other sciences). The results indicate that accounting research receives significantly less attention from the general public than all other disciplines and also performs relatively poorly in receiving policymakers' attention compared to both economics and finance. Within accounting subtopics, tax research receives more attention from the general public and policymakers than other topic areas. We also find that articles in other disciplines' elite journals cite relatively few of accounting's elite-level publications, but non-elite journal articles cite accounting research in similar numbers to other disciplines. Finally, we rank scholars, institutions, and journals by the attention they receive. We discuss how these findings could impact accounting education. Data Availability: Requests for data may be made to the authors.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Education,Accounting

Reference60 articles.

1. Altmetric. 2018. What are altmetrics? Available at: https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/

2. Altmetric. 2020. What outputs and sources does Altmetric track? Available at: https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060968-what-outputs-and-sources-does-altmetric-track-

3. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). 2008. Final report of the AACSB International Impact of Research Task Force. Available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/publications/research-reports/impact-of-research.ashx

4. Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). 2018. 2018 eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for accounting accreditation. Available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/accounting/standards-and-tables/2018-accounting-standards.ashx

5. Basu, S. 2012. How can accounting researchers become more innovative?Accounting Horizons26 ( 4): 851– 870. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-10311

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3