Corporate Sustainability: A Model Uncertainty Analysis of Materiality

Author:

Berchicci Luca1ORCID,King Andrew A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Erasmus University Rotterdam

2. Boston University

Abstract

ABSTRACT For decades, scholars searched for a connection between a corporation's current performance with respect to sustainability and the future returns of its stock. In 2016, Khan, Serafeim, and Yoon published an apparent breakthrough in this quest: guidance on materiality from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board allowed the construction of corporate sustainability scales that reliably predicted stock returns. Their finding had immediate and broad impact, but it remains, in its authors' own words, just “first evidence.” Here, we further explore the relationship between material-sustainability and stock returns by performing a “model uncertainty analysis.” We reproduce the original estimate but conclude that it is a statistical artifact. We then use machine learning to explore the practicality of employing historical associations to determine which aspects of sustainability are material to investors. We conclude that, for one popular source of data on corporate sustainability, accurate guidance on materiality may be difficult to achieve. JEL Classifications: Q51; D22; L25; C11; C18.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Angrist, J. D. , and PischkeJ.-S.. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

2. Berchicci, L. , and KingA. A.. 2022. Building knowledge by mapping model uncertainty in six studies of social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal. 43(7): 1319–1346.

3. Berg, F. , Kölbel,J. F. and Rigobon.R. 2020. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3603032

4. Bloomfield, R . 2002. The “incomplete revelation hypothesis” and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons16(3): 233–243. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2002.16.3.233

5. Bloomfield, R. , RennekampK., and SteenhovenB.. 2018. No system is perfect: Understanding how registration-based editorial processes affect reproducibility and investment in research quality. Journal of Accounting Research56 (2): 313–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12208

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Themed issue: Political strategy in and by organizations;Strategic Organization;2023-11

2. Standards and innovation: A review and introduction to the special issue;Research Policy;2023-10

3. Employee Satisfaction, Labor Market Flexibility, and Stock Returns Around the World;Management Science;2023-08-31

4. Writing a useful empirical journal article;Journal of Management Scientific Reports;2023-07-19

5. De-emphasizing Statistical Significance;Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium;2023-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3