Abstract
AbstractThe rapidly growing research landscape in finance, encompassing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics and associated Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, presents challenges for both new researchers and seasoned practitioners. This study aims to systematically map the research area, identify knowledge gaps, and examine potential research areas for researchers and practitioners. The investigation focuses on three primary research questions: the main research themes concerning ESG and AI in finance, the evolution of research intensity and interest in these areas, and the application and evolution of AI techniques specifically in research studies within the ESG and AI in finance domain. Eight archetypical research domains were identified: (i) Trading and Investment, (ii) ESG Disclosure, Measurement and Governance, (iii) Firm Governance, (iv) Financial Markets and Instruments, (v) Risk Management, (vi) Forecasting and Valuation, (vii) Data, and (viii) Responsible Use of AI. Distinctive AI techniques were found to be employed across these archetypes. The study contributes to consolidating knowledge on the intersection of ESG, AI, and finance, offering an ontological inquiry and key takeaways for practitioners and researchers. Important insights include the popularity and crowding of the Trading and Investment domain, the growth potential of the Data archetype, and the high potential of Responsible Use of AI, despite its low publication count. By understanding the nuances of different research archetypes, researchers and practitioners can better navigate this complex landscape and contribute to a more sustainable and responsible financial sector.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference395 articles.
1. Abdalmuttaleb MA, Al-Sartawi M, Hussainey K, Razzaque A (2022) The role of artificial intelligence in sustainable finance. J Sustain Fin Invest. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2057405
2. Agarwala M, Burke M, Klusak P, Kraemer M, Volz U (2022) Nature loss and sovereign credit ratings. Report, Finance for Biodiversity Initiative. https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NatureLossSovereignCreditRatings.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2023
3. Akter S, Dwivedi YK, Sajib S, Biswas K, Bandara RJ, Michael K (2022) Algorithmic bias in machine learning-based marketing models. J Bus Res 144:201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.083
4. Ali S, Liu B, Su JJ (2022) Does corporate governance have a differential effect on downside and upside risk? J Bus Financ Acc 49(9–10):1642–1695
5. Alkaraan F, Albitar K, Hussainey K, Venkatesh VG (2022) Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: the influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technol Forecast Soc Change 175:121423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献