Affiliation:
1. University of Kentucky
2. The University of Alabama
3. Georgia State University
Abstract
ABSTRACT
In this study, we examine how information foraging by auditors affects audit evidence collection in two distinct contexts, and show how a small change to audit methodology mitigates the potentially harmful effects of foraging. Information Foraging Theory explains how, while navigating an information environment, individuals learn to acquire information through personally experiencing the costs incurred and the values obtained from information. Consistent with the theory, we find that auditors react to the immediately felt costs of information collection (e.g., time and effort) at the expense of a more global consideration of information value (i.e., auditors collect lower-quality audit evidence). However, foraging behavior is moderated by removing the personal cost to the individual auditor (identifying audit evidence for another member of the audit team to collect), further demonstrating that these personally felt costs influence auditor choices in a way that reduces the quality of information collected. We contribute to the literature by demonstrating how information foraging can influence evidence quality and, thus, audit quality, and how a slight alteration of audit methodology can mitigate this behavior.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference36 articles.
1. Choice and foraging;Abarca;Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,1982
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2011. Audit Sampling. AU-C Section 530. New York, NY: AICPA.
3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2012. Audit Sampling: Audit Guide. Audit Sampling Committee. New York, NY: AICPA.
4. Heuristics and biases in diagnostic reasoning: I. Priors, error costs, and test accuracy;Baron;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1988
5. Resolving audit engagement challenges through communication;Bobek;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2012
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献