Abstract
SUMMARY
This paper summarizes '“Auditor Independence in the United States: Cornerstone of the Profession or Thorn in Our Side?”' (Church, Jenkins, and Stanley 2018). Their paper maintains that while the concept of independence is theoretically appealing, it is fraught with practical problems. Church et al. (2018) analyze the current oversight of auditor independence in the U.S. and the need for auditor independence from the perspective of various parties involved in the financial reporting process. In doing so, the paper discusses implications and challenges affecting one or more of these parties. Finally, Church et al. (2018) evaluate alternatives to the current regulatory approach of prohibiting various auditor client relationships to manage auditor independence. The paper concludes that increasing audit committees' responsibilities for monitoring auditor independence, along with additional disclosure about threats and safeguards to auditor independence, is worthy of further discussion and debate as a path toward addressing the auditor independence conundrum.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference25 articles.
1. Why good accountants do bad audits;Bazerman;Harvard Business Review,2002
2. The impossibility of auditor independence;Bazerman;Sloan Management Review,1997
3. The audit committee oversight process;Beasley;Contemporary Accounting Research,2009
4. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest;Cain;The Journal of Legal Studies,2005
5. Auditor independence in the United States: Cornerstone of the profession or thorn in our side?;Church;Accounting Horizons,2018
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献