Auditor Independence in the United States: Cornerstone of the Profession or Thorn in Our Side?

Author:

Church Bryan K.1,Jenkins J. Gregory2ORCID,Stanley Jonathan D.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Georgia Institute of Technology

2. Auburn University

Abstract

SYNOPSIS The objective of this paper is to provide a systematic evaluation of independence as a foundational element of the auditing profession. We maintain that while independence is a theoretically appealing construct, it is fraught with practical problems surrounding its implementation, monitoring, and regulation. We analyze the current oversight of auditor independence and evaluate the need for auditor independence from the perspective of information users and information producers. In the process, we discuss important implications and intractable challenges that affect one or more parties involved in the financial-reporting process. Finally, we carefully evaluate alternatives to the current regulatory approach for managing auditor independence (i.e., proscribing various auditor-client relationships). We conclude that increasing audit committees' responsibilities for monitoring the auditor's independence—along with additional disclosure about threats and safeguards to auditor independence—is worthy of further consideration and debate as a path toward addressing the auditor independence conundrum.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Accounting

Reference175 articles.

1. Does mandated disclosure induce a structural change in the determinants of nonaudit service purchases?;Abbott;Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2011

2. Why do private companies demand auditing? A case for organizational loss of control;Abdel-khalik;Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,1993

3. Enron's collapse: The auditors: Who's keeping the accountants accountable?;Abelson;The Los Angeles Times,2002

4. What drives auditor selection?;Almer;Current Issues in Auditing,2014

5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2015a. Code of Professional Conduct. New York, NY: AICPA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3