Online Accounting Education versus In-Class Delivery: Does Course Level Matter?

Author:

Chen Clement C.1,Jones Keith T.1,Moreland Keith A.1

Affiliation:

1. Clement C. Chen is a Professor at the University of Michigan–Flint, Keith T. Jones is a Professor at the University of North Alabama, and Keith A. Moreland is a Professor at the University of Michigan–Flint.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study examines whether the effectiveness of online accounting education relative to traditional in-class delivery depends upon the level of the course. Students enrolled in principles and advanced cost/managerial and in advanced financial accounting courses were surveyed regarding their perceptions on several dimensions. The results suggest that the course level is important when assessing whether it is advisable to offer online accounting courses. In advanced courses, the outcomes examined were significantly more favorable for traditional classroom environments than for online, while the delivery mode was not important in principles courses when controlling for other variables. The results also provide further support for the notion that blended learning, i.e., offering a few on-campus class meetings for a predominately online course, may be desirable regardless of course level, but that course level is potentially important when deciding upon the mix of face-to-face versus online instruction. Data Availability: Available upon request.

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Subject

Education,Accounting

Reference51 articles.

1. Using Internet-based online assessment: A case study;Aisbitt;Accounting Education: An International Journal,2005

2. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation;Alavi;MIS Quarterly,1994

3. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis;Allen;Journal of Communication,2004

4. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) . 2011 . The virtual classroom: Accounting education . Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i63oKO2dBQ0&list=PL969C2C2C848E 52E0&index=4&feature=plpp_video

5. How much does “subject matter” matter? A study of disciplinary effects in online M.B.A. courses;Arbaugh;Academy of Management Learning & Education,2005

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3