Affiliation:
1. California State University, Fullerton
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study uses covenant violations as a quasi-natural experimental setting to examine creditors’ roles in shaping corporate cost behavior. Using a regression discontinuity design, I find that cost stickiness experiences a sharp decline following debt covenant violations when control rights are transferred to creditors. The cost stickiness effect is more substantial for borrowers with lower credit ratings and when creditors possess greater bargaining power. The effect is also more pronounced during industry downturns when borrowers have fewer alternative sources of finance. Results are consistent when I use alternative measures of cost stickiness and alternative research designs. Overall, my evidence indicates that creditors play a monitoring role in firms’ cost behaviors and identifies a specific channel (loan covenants) through which the misalignment of incentives can impact cost asymmetry.
JEL Classifications: D24; G32; M41.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Reference50 articles.
1. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?;Anderson,;Journal of Accounting Research,2003
2. The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting;Armstrong,;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010
3. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note;Balakrishnan,;Contemporary Accounting Research,2008
4. Creditor influence and CEO compensation: Evidence from debt covenant violations;Balsam,;The Accounting Review,2018
5. Asymmetric cost behavior;Banker,;Journal of Management Accounting Research,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献