Abstract
ABSTRACT
We synthesize the growing literature on asymmetric cost behavior—a new way of thinking about costs and, by extension, earnings. While the traditional cost behavior model describes a mechanistic relation between activity and costs, this alternative view recognizes the primitives of cost behavior—resource adjustment costs and managerial decisions. These primitives give rise to “sticky” and “anti-sticky” costs, along with traditional “fixed” and “variable” costs as extreme cases. We formulate an integrated framework of asymmetric cost behavior and review the empirical evidence in support of this framework and its implications for both cost and financial accounting research. We clarify empirical issues and show that recent contrary claims about the validity of findings in the literature are unwarranted because of econometric errors. We present new comprehensive evidence from Global Compustat, which demonstrates that asymmetric cost behavior is a pervasive global phenomenon. We also discuss research opportunities.
Publisher
American Accounting Association
Subject
Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference48 articles.
1. Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”?;Anderson;Journal of Accounting Research,2003
2. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs;Anderson;Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,2007
3. Anderson, S. W., and W. N. Lanen.
2009. Understanding Cost Management: What Can We Learn from the Empirical Evidence on “Sticky Costs”?Working paper, University of Michigan.
4. Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of costs?;Balakrishnan;Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,2004
5. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note;Balakrishnan;Contemporary Accounting Research,2008
Cited by
209 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献