Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory

Author:

Clarridge J E1,Shawar R M1,Shinnick T M1,Plikaytis B B1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

We investigated the use of DNA amplification by the polymerase chain reaction reaction (PCR) for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical specimens. Two-thirds of each sample was processed for smear and culture by standard methods, and one-third was submitted for DNA extraction, amplification of a 317-bp segment within the insertion element IS6110, and detection by agarose gel electrophoresis, hybridization, or both. DNA was prepared from over 5,000 samples, with 623 samples being culture positive for acid-fast bacilli. Of 218 specimens that were identified as M. tuberculosis, 181 (85%) were positive by PCR. In the M. tuberculosis culture-positive group, PCR was positive for 136 of 145 (94%) and 45 of 73 (62%) of the fluorochrome smear-positive and -negative specimens, respectively. Of 948 specimens that were either culture positive for mycobacteria other than M. tuberculosis or culture negative, 937 specimens were negative by PCR and 11 (1%) specimens initially appeared to be false positive for M. tuberculosis. The reason for discrepant results varied; some errors were traced to the presence of an inhibitor in the specimen (7.3% in unselected specimens), nucleic acid contamination, low numbers of organisms in the specimen antituberculosis therapy, and possible low-level nonspecific hybridization. In comparison with culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 83.5, 99.0, and 94.2%, respectively, for PCR. When PCR was corrected for DNA contamination, the presence of inhibitor, and culture-negative disease, the values became 86.1, 99.7, and 98.4%, respectively. If the results for multiple specimens submitted from the same patient are considered, no patient who had three of more sputum specimens tested would have been misdiagnosed.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 286 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3