Detection of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in alternative irrigation water by culture and qPCR-based methods in the Mid-Atlantic U.S.

Author:

Acheamfour Chanelle L.12,Parveen Salina1ORCID,Gutierrez Alan3,Handy Eric T.3,Behal Sara3,Kim Donghyun3,Kim Seongyun34,East Cheryl3,Xiong Ray35,Haymaker Joseph R.1ORCID,Micallef Shirley A.6ORCID,Rosenberg Goldstein Rachel E.7,Kniel Kalmia E.5ORCID,Sapkota Amy R.7ORCID,Hashem Fawzy8,Sharma Manan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agriculture, Food and Resource Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland, USA

2. Department of Biological Sciences, Delaware State University, Dover, Delaware, USA

3. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, USA

4. Department of Environmental System Engineering, Chonnam National University, Yeosu, Republic of Korea

5. Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

6. Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

7. Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, USA

8. Department of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Alternative irrigation waters (rivers, ponds, and reclaimed water) can harbor bacterial foodborne pathogens like Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes , potentially contaminating fruit and vegetable commodities. Detecting foodborne pathogens using qPCR-based methods may accelerate testing methods and procedures compared to culture-based methods. This study compared detection of S. enterica and L. monocytogenes by qPCR (real-time PCR) and culture methods in irrigation waters to determine the influence of water type (river, pond, and reclaimed water), season (winter, spring, summer, and fall), or volume (0.1, 1, and 10 L) on sensitivity, accuracy, specificity, and positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values of these methods. Water samples were collected by filtration through modified Moore swabs (MMS) over a 2-year period at 11 sites in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. on a bi-weekly or monthly schedule. For qPCR, bacterial DNA from culture-enriched samples ( n = 1,990) was analyzed by multiplex qPCR specific for S. enterica and L. monocytogenes . For culture detection, enriched samples were selectively enriched, isolated, and PCR confirmed. PPVs for qPCR detection of S. enterica and L. monocytogenes were 68% and 67%, respectively. The NPV were 87% ( S. enterica ) and 85% ( L. monocytogenes ). Higher levels of qPCR/culture agreement were observed in spring and summer compared to fall and winter for S. enterica ; for L. monocytogenes , lower levels of agreement were observed in winter compared to spring, summer, and fall. Reclaimed and pond water supported higher levels of qPCR/culture agreement compared to river water for both S. enterica and L. monocytogenes , indicating that water type may influence the agreement of these results. IMPORTANCE Detecting foodborne pathogens in irrigation water can inform interventions and management strategies to reduce risk of contamination and illness associated with fresh and fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. The use of non-culture methods like qPCR has the potential to accelerate the testing process. Results indicated that pond and reclaimed water showed higher levels of agreement between culture and qPCR methods than river water, perhaps due to specific physiochemical characteristics of the water. These findings also show that season and sample volume affect the agreement of qPCR and culture results. Overall, qPCR methods could be more confidently utilized to determine the absence of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes in irrigation water samples examined in this study.

Funder

USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture

USDA | Agricultural Research Service

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3