Abstract
A biological safety cabinet was tested to determine the effect of crossdrafts (such as those created by normal laboratory activity or ventilation) upon the ability of the cabinet to protect both experiments and investigators. A simple crossdraft, controllable from 50 to 200 feet per min (fpm; 15.24 to 60.96 m/min), was created across the face of the unit. Modifications of standardized procedures involving controlled bacterial aerosol challenges provided stringent test conditions. Results indicated that, as the crossflow velocities exceeded 100 fpm, the ability of the cabinet to protect either experiments or investigators decreased logarithmically with increasing crossdraft speed. Because 100 fpm is an airspeed easily achieved by some air conditioning and heating vents (open windows and doorways may create velocities far in excess of 200 fpm), the proper placement of a biological safety cabinet within the laboratory--away from such disruptive air currents--is essential to satisfactory cabinet performance.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference21 articles.
1. Development of a laminar airflow biological cabinet;Akers RI L;Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.,1969
2. American Society ofHeatilg Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers Inc. 1966. ASHRAE guide and data book. American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers Inc. New York.
3. Containment of microbial aerosols in a microbiological safety cabinet;Barbeito M. S.;Appl. Microbiol.,1968
4. Carrier Air Conditioning Co. 1965. Handbook of air conditioning system design. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York.
5. Biohazard hood to prevent infection during microbiological procedures;Coriell L. L;Appl. Microbiol.,1968
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献