Affiliation:
1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, USA
2. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
3. Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The specific antimicrobial resistance (AMR) decreases that can be expected from reducing antimicrobial (AM) use in U.S. beef production have not been defined. To address this data gap, feces were recovered from 36 lots of “raised without antibiotics” (RWA) and 36 lots of “conventional” (CONV) beef cattle. Samples (
n
= 719) were collected during harvest and distributed over a year. AMR was assessed by (i) the culture of six AM-resistant bacteria (ARB), (ii) quantitative PCR (qPCR) for 10 AMR genes (ARGs), (iii) a qPCR array of 84 ARGs, and (iv) metagenomic sequencing. Generally, AMR levels were similar, but some were higher in CONV beef cattle. The prevalence of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC
r
)
Escherichia coli
was marginally different between production systems (CONV, 47.5%; RWA, 34.8%;
P
= 0.04), but the seasonal effect (summer, 92.8%; winter, 48.3%;
P
< 0.01) was greater. Erythromycin-resistant (ERY
r
)
Enterococcus
sp. concentrations significantly differed between production systems (CONV, 1.91 log
10
CFU/g; RWA, 0.73 log
10
CFU/g;
P
< 0.01). Levels of
aadA1
,
ant
(
6
)-
I
,
bla
ACI
,
erm
(A),
erm
(B),
erm
(C),
erm
(F),
erm
(Q),
tet
(A),
tet
(B),
tet
(M), and
tet
(X) ARGs were higher (
P
< 0.05) in the CONV system. Aggregate abundances of all 43 ARGs detected by metagenomic sequencing and the aggregate abundances of ARGs in the aminoglycoside, β-lactam, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS), and tetracycline AM classes did not differ (log
2
fold change < 1.0) between CONV and RWA systems. These results suggest that further reductions of AM use in U.S. beef cattle production may not yield significant AMR reductions beyond MLS and tetracycline resistance.
IMPORTANCE
The majority of antimicrobial (AM) use in the United States is for food-animal production, leading to concerns that typical AM use patterns during “conventional” (CONV) beef cattle production in the United States contribute broadly to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) occurrence. In the present study, levels of AMR were generally similar between CONV and “raised without antibiotics” (RWA) cattle. Only a limited number of modest AMR increases was observed in CONV cattle, primarily involving macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS) and tetracycline resistance. Macrolides (tylosin) and tetracyclines (chlortetracycline) are administered in-feed for relatively long durations to reduce liver abscesses. To ensure judicious AM use, the animal health, economic, and AMR impacts of shorter duration in-feed administration of these AMs should be examined. However, given the modest AMR reductions observed, further reductions of AM use in U.S. beef cattle production may not yield significant AMR reductions beyond MLS and tetracycline resistance.
Funder
USDA-Agricultural Research Service, NP108 - Food Safety
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuaria
USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference64 articles.
1. Genomic interplay in bacterial communities: implications for growth promoting practices in animal husbandry
2. Impacts of antibiotic use in agriculture: what are the benefits and risks?
3. Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
4. FDA. 2015. 2013 Summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/UCM440584.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2015.
5. Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance in Agroecosystems: State of the Science