Affiliation:
1. Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Faculty of Science and Science Education, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel
2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Science Education, University of Haifa, Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
Abstract
ABSTRACT
During cold storage after milk collection, psychrotrophic bacterial populations dominate the microflora, and their extracellular enzymes, mainly proteases and lipases, contribute to the spoilage of dairy products. The diversity, dynamics, and enzymatic traits of culturable psychrotrophs in raw milk from four farms were investigated over a 10-month period. About 20% of the isolates were found to be novel species, indicating that there is still much to be learned about culturable psychrotrophs in raw milk. The psychrotrophic isolates were identified and classified in seven classes. Three classes were predominant, with high species richness (18 to 21 species per class) in different seasons of the year:
Gammaproteobacteria
in spring and winter,
Bacilli
in summer, and
Actinobacteria
in autumn. The four minor classes were
Alphaproteobacteria
,
Betaproteobacteria
,
Flavobacteria
, and
Sphingobacteria
. The dominant classes were found in all four dairies, although every dairy had its own unique “bacterial profile.” Most but not all bacterial isolates had either lipolytic or both lipolytic and proteolytic activities. Only a few isolates showed proteolytic activity alone. The dominant genera,
Pseudomonas
and
Acinetobacter
(
Gammaproteobacteria
), showed mainly lipolytic activity,
Microbacterium
(
Actinobacteria
) was highly lipolytic and proteolytic, and the lactic acid bacteria (
Lactococcus
and
Leuconostoc
) displayed very minor enzymatic ability. Hence, the composition of psychrotrophic bacterial flora in raw milk has an important role in the determination of milk quality. Monitoring the dominant psychrotrophic species responsible for the production of heat-stable proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes offers a sensitive and efficient tool for maintaining better milk quality in the milk industry.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference35 articles.
1. Aquilanti, L., L. Dell Aquila, E. Zannini, A. Zocchetti, and F. Clementi. 2006. Resident lactic acid bacteria in raw milk Canestrato Pugliese cheese. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.43:161-167.
2. Barbano, D. M., Y. Ma, and M. V. Santos. 2006. Influence of raw milk quality on fluid milk shelf life. J. Dairy Sci.89:E15-E19.
3. Cousin, M. A. 1982. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in milk and dairy products: a review. J. Food Prot.45:172-207.
4. Craven, H. M., and B. J. Macauley. 1992. Microorganisms in pasteurized milk after refrigerated storage. 1. Identification of types. Aust. J. Dairy Technol.47:38-45.
5. Detection and activity of a bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides