Affiliation:
1. Center for Teaching and Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203
Abstract
Online courses are a large and growing part of the undergraduate education landscape, but many biology instructors are skeptical about the effectiveness of online instruction. We reviewed studies comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face (F2F) undergraduate biology courses. Five studies compared student performance in multiple course sections at community colleges, while eight were smaller scale and compared student performance in particular biology courses at a variety of types of institutions. Of the larger-scale studies, two found that students in F2F sections outperformed students in online sections, and three found no significant difference; it should be noted, however, that these studies reported little information about course design. Of the eight smaller scale studies, six found no significant difference in student performance between the F2F and online sections, while two found that the online sections outperformed the F2F sections. In alignment with general findings about online teaching and learning, these results suggest that well-designed online biology courses can be effective at promoting student learning. Three recommendations for effective online instruction in biology are given: the inclusion of an online orientation to acclimate students to the online classroom; student-instructor and student-student interactions facilitated through synchronous and asynchronous communication; and elements that prompt student reflection and self-assessment. We conclude that well-designed online biology courses can be as effective as their traditional counterparts, but that more research is needed to elucidate specific course elements and structures that can maximize online students’ learning of key biology skills and concepts.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Education
Reference17 articles.
1. Allen IE Seaman J2010Class differences: online education in the United States 2010 Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) [Online] http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/class_differencesAccessed 21 March 2016
2. Allen IE Seaman J2016Online report card: tracking online education in the United States (Rep.) Sloan Consortium (Sloan-C) [Online] http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-education-united-states-2015/Accessed 16 March 2016
3. The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course
4. Comparing Web, Correspondence and Lecture versions of a second‐year non‐major Biology course
5. Democratizing education? Examining access and usage patterns in massive open online courses
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献