Different Effects of CSA and CSB Deficiency on Sensitivity to Oxidative DNA Damage

Author:

de Waard Harm1,de Wit Jan1,Andressoo Jaan-Olle1,van Oostrom Conny T. M.2,Riis Bente3,Weimann Allan3,Poulsen Henrik E.3,van Steeg Harry2,Hoeijmakers Jan H. J.1,van der Horst Gijsbertus T. J.1

Affiliation:

1. MGC, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam

2. Laboratory of Health Effects Research, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mutations in the CSA and CSB genes cause Cockayne syndrome, a rare inherited disorder characterized by UV sensitivity, severe neurological abnormalities, and progeriod symptoms. Both gene products function in the transcription-coupled repair (TCR) subpathway of nucleotide excision repair (NER), providing the cell with a mechanism to remove transcription-blocking lesions from the transcribed strands of actively transcribed genes. Besides a function in TCR of NER lesions, a role of CSB in (transcription-coupled) repair of oxidative DNA damage has been suggested. In this study we used mouse models to compare the effect of a CSA or a CSB defect on oxidative DNA damage sensitivity at the levels of the cell and the intact organism. In contrast to CSB −/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), CSA −/− MEFs are not hypersensitive to gamma-ray or paraquat treatment. Similar results were obtained for keratinocytes. In contrast, both CSB −/− and CSA −/− embryonic stem cells show slight gamma-ray sensitivity. Finally, CSB −/− but not CSA −/− mice fed with food containing di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (causing elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage in the liver) show weight reduction. These findings not only uncover a clear difference in oxidative DNA damage sensitivity between CSA - and CSB -deficient cell lines and mice but also show that sensitivity to oxidative DNA damage is not a uniform characteristic of Cockayne syndrome. This difference in the DNA damage response between CSA- and CSB- deficient cells is unexpected, since until now no consistent differences between CSA and CSB patients have been reported. We suggest that the CSA and CSB proteins in part perform separate roles in different DNA damage response pathways.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Cell Biology,Molecular Biology

Reference62 articles.

1. Ali, S., S. K. Jain, M. Abdulla, and M. Athar. 1996. Paraquat induced DNA damage by reactive oxygen species. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 39 : 63-67.

2. Asami, S., and H. Kasai. 2000. 8-OH-dG: extraction/enzyme treatment/ measurement of 8-OH-dG, p. 224-228. In N. Taniguchi and J. M. Gutteridge (ed.), Experimental protocols for reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.

3. Balajee, A. S., A. May, G. L. Dianov, E. C. Friedberg, and V. A. Bohr. 1997. Reduced RNA polymerase II transcription in intact and permeabilized Cockayne syndrome group B cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 4306-4311.

4. Bootsma D. K. H. Kraemer J. E. Cleaver and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers. 2001. Nucleotide excision repair syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy 8th ed. p. 677-703. McGraw-Hill New York N.Y.

5. Bradsher, J., J. Auriol, L. Proietti de Santis, S. Iben, J. L. Vonesch, I. Grummt, and J. M. Egly. 2002. CSB is a component of RNA pol I transcription. Mol. Cell 10 : 819-829.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3