Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Pathology
2. Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression
3. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois 60064
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The three far-upstream element (FUSE) binding protein (FBP) family members have been ascribed different functions in gene regulation. They were therefore examined with various biochemical, molecular biological, and cell biological tests to evaluate whether their sequence differences reflect functional customization or neutral changes at unselected residues. Each FBP displayed a characteristic profile of intrinsic transcription activation and repression, binding with protein partners, and subcellular trafficking. Although some differences, such as weakened FBP3 nuclear localization, were predictable from primary sequence differences, the unexpected failure of FBP3 to bind the FBP-interacting repressor (FIR) was traced to seemingly conservative substitutions within a small patch of an N-terminal α-helix. The transactivation strength and the FIR-binding strength of the FBPs were in the opposite order. Despite their distinguishing features and differential activities, the FBPs traffic to shared subnuclear sites and regulate many common target genes, including c-
myc
. Though a variety of functions have been attributed to the FBPs, based upon their panel of shared and unique features, we propose that they constitute a molecular regulatory kit that tunes the expression of shared targets through a common mechanism.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Cell Biology,Molecular Biology
Reference48 articles.
1. Avigan, M. I., B. Strober, and D. Levens. 1990. A far upstream element stimulates c-myc expression in undifferentiated leukemia cells. J. Biol. Chem.265:18538-18545.
2. Bazar, L., V. Harris, I. Sunitha, D. Hartmann, and M. Avigan. 1995. A transactivator of c-myc is coordinately regulated with the proto-oncogene during cellular growth. Oncogene10:2229-2238.
3. Braddock, D. T., J. L. Baber, D. Levens, and G. M. Clore. 2002. Molecular basis of sequence-specific single-stranded DNA recognition by KH domains: solution structure of a complex between hnRNP KKH3 and single-stranded DNA. EMBO J.21:3476-3485.
4. Braddock, D. T., J. M. Louis, J. L. Baber, D. Levens, and G. M. Clore. 2002. Structure and dynamics of KH domains from FBP bound to single-stranded DNA. Nature415:1051-1056.
5. Briata, P., S. V. Forcales, M. Ponassi, G. Corte, C. Y. Chen, M. Karin, P. L. Puri, and R. Gherzi. 2005. p38-dependent phosphorylation of the mRNA decay-promoting factor KSRP controls the stability of select myogenic transcripts. Mol. Cell20:891-903.
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献