Affiliation:
1. Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen
2. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The in vitro interaction between terbinafine and the azoles voriconazole, miconazole, and itraconazole against five clinical
Scedosporium prolificans
isolates after 48 and 72 h of incubation was tested by a microdilution checkerboard (eight-by-twelve) technique. The antifungal effects of the drugs alone and in combination on the fungal biomass as well as on the metabolic activity of fungi were measured using a spectrophotometric method and two colorimetric methods, based on the lowest drug concentrations showed 75 and 50% growth inhibition (MIC-1 and MIC-2, respectively). The nature and the intensity of the interactions were assessed using a nonparametric approach (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] index model) and a fully parametric response surface approach (Greco model) of the Loewe additivity (LA) no-interaction theory as well as a nonparametric (Prichard model) and a semiparametric response surface approaches of the Bliss independence (BI) no-interaction theory. Statistically significant synergy was found between each of the three azoles and terbinafine in all cases, although with different intensities. A 27- to 64-fold and 16- to 90-fold reduction of the geometric mean of the azole and terbinafine MICs, respectively, was observed when they were combined, resulting in FIC indices of <1 to 0.02. Using the MIC-1 higher levels of synergy were obtained, , which were more consistent between the two incubation periods than using the MIC-2. The strongest synergy among the azoles was found with miconazole using the BI-based models and with voriconazole using the LA-based models. The synergistic effects both on fungal growth and metabolic activity were more potent after 72 h of incubation. Fully parametric approaches in combination with the modified colorimetric method might prove useful for testing the in vitro interaction of antifungal drugs against filamentous fungi.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference48 articles.
1. Bailey, E. M., D. J. Krakovsky, and M. J. Rybak. 1990. The triazole antifungal agents: a review of itraconazole and fluconazole. Pharmacotherapy10:146-153.
2. Balfour, J. A., and D. Faulds. 1992. Terbinafine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in superficial mycoses. Drugs43:259-284.
3. Barchiesi, F., L. F. Di Francesco, P. Compagnucci, D. Arzeni, A. Giacometti, and G. Scalise. 1998. In-vitro interaction of terbinafine with amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole against clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.41:59-65.
4. Barriere S. L. 1990. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of traditional systemic antifungal agents. Pharmacotherapy 10: 134S-140S.
5. Berenbaum, M. C. 1985. The expected effect of a combination of agents: the general solution. J. Theor. Biol.114:413-431.
Cited by
229 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献