Abstract
Five general methods for recovering indigenous viruses from raw wastewater sludge were compared. Each method included elution, concentration, and disinfection steps. The elution method, found to consistently yield the greatest viral recovery, was a two-phase technique that involved blending sludge with Freon. Other methods, including two being tested as American Society for Testing Materials tentative standard methods, were less effective. Viral recoveries were generally greater (sometimes much greater) if samples were concentrated by high-speed centrifugation rather than by organic flocculation with 3% beef extract. Three cell lines were used to measure viral recoveries by the plaque assay. The efficiency of recovery was greatest on BGM cells, followed by RD and MA-104 cells.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference20 articles.
1. Abid S. H. C. Lue-Hing and S. Sedita. 1978. Development of a method for concentrating enteroviruses in anaerobically digested sludge. The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago report no. 78-13. The Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago Chicago Ill.
2. Method for recovering viruses from river water solids;Berg G.;Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,1980
3. A method for recovering viruses from sludges;Berman D.;J. Virol. Methods,1981
4. Urea-lysine method for recovery of enteroviruses from sludge;Farrah S. R.;Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,1981
5. Practical method for detecting poliovirus in anaerobic digester sludge;Glass J. S.;Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,1978
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献