Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility

Author:

Kremer K.1,van Soolingen D.1,Frothingham R.2,Haas W. H.3,Hermans P. W. M.4,Martín C.5,Palittapongarnpim P.6,Plikaytis B. B.7,Riley L. W.8,Yakrus M. A.9,Musser J. M.10,van Embden J. D. A.11

Affiliation:

1. Diagnostic Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening1 and

2. Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 277052;

3. Molecular Mycobacteriology Laboratory, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany3;

4. Laboratory of Pediatrics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam,4 The Netherlands;

5. Department of Microbiology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain5; and

6. Department of Microbiology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand6

7. National Center for Infectious Diseases7and

8. School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 947208;

9. Diagnostics and Molecular Epidemiology Section,9 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333;

10. Institute for the Study of Human Bacterial Pathogenesis, Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 7703010;

11. Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases,11 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, and

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, the currently known typing methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were evaluated with regard to reproducibility, discrimination, and specificity. Therefore, 90 M. tuberculosis complex strains, originating from 38 countries, were tested in five restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing methods and in seven PCR-based assays. In all methods, one or more repetitive DNA elements were targeted. The strain typing and the DNA fingerprint analysis were performed in the laboratory most experienced in the respective method. To examine intralaboratory reproducibility, blinded duplicate samples were included. The specificities of the various methods were tested by inclusion of 10 non- M. tuberculosis complex strains. All five RFLP typing methods were highly reproducible. The reliability of the PCR-based methods was highest for the mixed-linker PCR, followed by variable numbers of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and spoligotyping. In contrast, the double repetitive element PCR (DRE-PCR), IS 6110 inverse PCR, IS 6110 ampliprinting, and arbitrarily primed PCR (APPCR) typing were found to be poorly reproducible. The 90 strains were best discriminated by IS 6110 RFLP typing, yielding 84 different banding patterns, followed by mixed-linker PCR (81 patterns), APPCR (71 patterns), RFLP using the polymorphic GC-rich sequence as a probe (70 patterns), DRE-PCR (63 patterns), spoligotyping (61 patterns), and VNTR typing (56 patterns). We conclude that for epidemiological investigations, strain differentiation by IS 6110 RFLP or mixed-linker PCR are the methods of choice. A strong association was found between the results of different genetic markers, indicating a clonal population structure of M. tuberculosis strains. Several separate genotype families within the M. tuberculosis complex could be recognized on the basis of the genetic markers used.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Cited by 471 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3