Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology
2. Department of Infectious Diseases
3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universidad de Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
4. Department of Microbiology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The BrucellaCapt test is an immunocapture agglutination test suggested as a possible substitute for the Coombs test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis. Here it is compared with classical tests using 321 samples from 48 patients with brucellosis (6.9 ± 1.7 samples per patient), including 20 patients with focal disease and 8 patients with a total of 9 relapse episodes (mean follow-up, 18 months). The BrucellaCapt test was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and we also used a variant of the BrucellaCapt test in which the microtiter plates were not coated with antibodies against total human immunoglobulin (BCAPV). The correlation between the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests was 0.982 (
P
< 0.001), with 260 coincident pairs of titers (81%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests with respect to the Coombs test were 0.969 and 0.960, respectively. Upon admission, the BrucellaCapt, BCAPV, and Coombs tests and the microagglutination test (MAT) were positive for all cases: titers were 1/2,560 by the BrucellaCapt test, 1/2,560 by the BCAPV test, 1/1,280 by the Coombs test, and 1/320 by the MAT. The decreases in the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV titers over time were pronounced in comparison with the Coombs titers. Cumulative probabilities of persistence 12 months after therapy were as follows: 80% by the BrucellaCapt test, 80% by the BCAPV test, 87% by the Coombs test, and 35% by the MAT. Serological changes during relapse were detected in seven cases (88%) by the Coombs test, in five cases by the BrucellaCapt and BCAPV tests, and in three cases by the MAT. The BrucellaCapt test is a sensitive, specific, and simple test for routine use in human brucellosis. Similar results were obtained with the BCAPV test. However, in some cases of relapse and chronic forms of the disease, the slight changes observed in low-affinity antibodies alone are better detected by the Coombs test.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Microbiology (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy
Reference32 articles.
1. Ardic, N., M. Ozyurt, O. Sezer, A. Erdemoglu, and T. Haznedaroglu. 2005. Comparison of Coombs and immunocapture-agglutination tests in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Chin. Med. J.118:252-254.
2. Ariza, J., T. Pellicer, R. Pallarés, A. Foz, and F. Gudiol. 1992. Specific antibody profile in human brucellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.14:131-140.
3. Ariza, J., J. Corredoira, R. Pallarés, P. F. Viladrich, G. Rufi, M. Pujol, and F. Gudiol. 1995. Characteristics of and risk factor for relapse in human brucellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.20:1241-1249.
4. Ariza, J., C. Pigrau, C. Cañas, A. Marrón, F. Martínez, B. Almirante, J. M. Corredoira, A. Casanova, J. Fabregat, and A. Pahissa. 2001. Current understanding and management of chronic hepatosplenic suppurative brucellosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.32:1024-1033.
5. Benito, R., E. Durán, J. Gil, and M. C. Rubio. 2000. Brucelosis osteoarticular: utilidad diagnóstica de las técnicas de inmunocaptura. Med. Clin.114:639.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献