Differentiated approach to the minimally invasive management of malignant obstructive jaundice

Author:

Galperin E. I.1ORCID,Akhaladze G. G.2ORCID,Vetshev P. S.3ORCID,Dyuzheva T. G.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chair of Hospital-Based Surgery, Faculty of Medicine of the Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)

2. Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia

3. Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Abstract

Attitude towards preoperative biliary drainage for malignant obstructive jaundice have recently changed twice. This is due certain factors including complications of minimally invasive biliary drainage, level of bile duct block, cholangitis, need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, time to scheduled surgery, severe general condition of patient, future liver remnant volume. We comprehensively searched PUBMED, MD Consult and National Library of Medicine using the following keywords: “obstructive jaundice (OJ)”, “cellular immunity”, “preoperative biliary drainage”, “selective biliary drainage”, “distal and proximal bile duct block”, “complications”. Randomized clinical trials and meta-analyzes, opinions of reputable specialists in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery and our own experimental and clinical studies were foreground. The analysis showed that preoperative biliary drainage is not a safe procedure and results an increased number of complications. Absolute indications for preoperative biliary drainage are cholangitis, need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increased risk of radical surgery and unresectable tumor. Future liver remnant volume should be considered in patients with portal cholangiocarcinoma followed by proximal block to determine indications for preoperative biliary drainage.

Publisher

Annals of Surgical Hepatology

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology,Surgery

Reference92 articles.

1. Wente M.N., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Gouma D.J., Izbicki J.R., Neoptolemos J.P., Padbury R.T., Sarr M.G., Traverso L.W., Yeo C.J., Büchler M.W. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142 (11): 761–768. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005.

2. Wente M.N., Veit J.A., Bassi C., Dervenis Ch., Fingerhut A., Gouma D.J., Izbicki J.R., Neoptolemos J.P., Padbury R.T., Sarr M.G., Yeo Ch.J., Büchler M.W. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007; 142 (2): 20–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.02.001.

3. Gouma D.J., van Geenen R.C., van Gulik T.M., de Haan R.J., de Wit L.T., Busch O.R., Obertop H. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann. Surg. 2000; 232 (12): 786–795. http://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00007.

4. Bassi С., Dervenis Ch., Butturini G., Fingerhut A., Yeo Ch., Izbicki J., Neoptolemos J., Sarr M., Traverso W., Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138 (5): 8–13. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001.

5. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240 (8): 205–213. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3