Abstract
The introduction of technological tools such as student response systems to dynamise classes in higher education has been increasing in recent years, although often without proper monitoring of their effects. This research aims to analyse the main added value of the use of the Wooclap platform in university education, and whether there are differences in its results depending on the heterogeneous characteristics of the courses and groups in which it is applied. To this end, a comparative analysis has been carried out in three different courses in the field of economics at the University of Valencia. In all three courses, questions were introduced in Wooclap during theory classes. Students in the three courses were given an anonymous survey at the end of the course to evaluate the use of this tool. The students were very satisfied with the tool, highlighting that it helps them to maintain their attention, identify the most important concepts, understand and consolidate them. Furthermore, by means of the Chi-square test, no significant differences were observed in the three groups, from which it can be deduced that beyond the specific characteristics of the course, the profile of the students or the lecturer, this tool can be extrapolated to different contexts and satisfactory results can be expected. The ease of implementation, the possibility of obtaining immediate feedback from students and breaking the monotony of classes are other advantages for lecturers. The conclusions drawn highlight the potential of Wooclap to extend its use in higher education.
Publisher
Academia Europea de Direccion y Economia de la Empresa
Reference57 articles.
1. Aguilar, M. (2012). Aprendizaje y Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación: Hacia nuevos escenarios educativos. Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales, Niñez Y Juventud, 10(2), 801-811.
2. Aldalur, I., & Perez, A. (2023). Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process. Heliyon, 9(1), e13135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13135
3. Altwijri, O., Alsadoon, E., Shahba, A. A. W., Soufan, W., & Alkathiri, S. (2022). The Effect of Using "Student Response Systems (SRS)" on Faculty Performance and Student Interaction in the Classroom. Sustainability, 14(22), 14957. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214957
4. Boostani, N., Brumelot, C., Ouvrard, L., Stockinger, P., Vigny, P.-J., Tice-Dsirn, U., & Ho, C. (2020). L'enseignement-apprentissage du lexique médiatisé par le smartphone en classe de langue (le cas de la plateforme Wooclap). In Archives Audovosuelles Inalco. https://hal.science/hal-03161986
5. Braçe-Diko, O., & Garrido-Cumbrera, M. (2022). Utilización de herramientas tecnológicas de dinamización docente en educación superior de asignaturas de geografía. Geosaberes: Revista de Estudos Geoeducacionais, 13(1), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.26895/geosaberes.v13i0.1315
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献