A systematic review of transcriptomic studies of the human endometrium reveals inconsistently reported differentially expressed genes

Author:

Walker Evangeline R1,McGrane Mollie23,Aplin John D23,Brison Daniel R123,Ruane Peter T23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Old Saint Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK

2. Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

3. Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Saint Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Genome-wide analysis of gene expression has been widely applied to study the endometrium, although to our knowledge no systematic reviews have been performed. Here, we identified 74 studies that described transcriptomes from whole (unprocessed) endometrium samples and found that these fitted into three broad investigative categories: endometrium across the menstrual cycle, endometrium in pathology and endometrium during hormone treatment. Notably, key participant information such as menstrual cycle length and body mass index was often not reported. Fertility status was frequently not defined and fertility-related pathologies, such as recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss, were variably defined, while hormone treatments differed between almost every study. A range of 1307–3637 reported differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were compared in four to seven studies in five sub-categories: (i) secretory vs proliferative stage endometrium, (ii) mid-secretory vs early secretory stage endometrium, (iii) mid-secretory endometrium from ovarian stimulation-treated participants vs controls, (iv) mid-secretory endometrium from RIF patients vs controls, and (v) mid-secretory eutopic endometrium from endometriosis patients vs controls. Only the first two sub-categories yielded consistently reported DEG between ≥3 studies, albeit in small numbers (<40), and these were enriched in developmental process and immune response annotations. This systematic review, though not PROSPERO registered, reveals that limited demographic detail, variable fertility definitions and differing hormone treatments in endometrial transcriptomic studies hinder their comparison, and that the large majority of reported DEG do not advance the identification of underlying biological mechanisms. Future studies should apply network biology approaches and experimental validation to establish causal gene expression signatures. Lay summary The endometrium lines the inner wall of the uterus and is the site where the fertilised egg implants to establish pregnancy. Disorders of the endometrium cause infertility and chronic pain. Techniques to measure genetic activity, termed transcriptomics, have been applied to better understand the endometrium in health and disease. We collated all studies, totalling 74, that describe transcriptomics of endometrial samples from non-pregnant women and compared study designs and genetic activity measurements. The studies generally looked at small numbers of samples, with most focussing on fertility rather than endometrial disorders. Study designs were variable, comparing women under different definitions of fertility and disease, and under different treatments. Additionally, key participant factors such as BMI were mostly not reported. These and other limitations produced genetic activity measurements that were inconsistent, especially in cases of infertility and endometrial disorders. Addressing these limitations could improve how transcriptomic approaches are used to advance endometrial health.

Publisher

Bioscientifica

Subject

Urology,Reproductive Medicine,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Embryology

Reference80 articles.

1. Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of 'omics' data: focus on human endometrium;Altmäe,2014

2. Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers;Altmäe,2017

3. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996,1997

4. The Endometrium: Molecular, Cellular and Clinical Perspectives;Aplin,2008

5. Use of 'omics for endometrial timing: the cycle moves on;Aplin,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3