Reworking the Tao–Mo exchange–correlation functional. II. De-orbitalization

Abstract

In Paper I [H. Francisco, A. C. Cancio, and S. B. Trickey, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 214102 (2023)], we gave a regularization of the Tao–Mo exchange functional that removes the order-of-limits problem in the original Tao–Mo form and also eliminates the unphysical behavior introduced by an earlier regularization while essentially preserving compliance with the second-order gradient expansion. The resulting simplified, regularized (sregTM) functional delivers performance on standard molecular and solid state test sets equal to that of the earlier revised, regularized Tao–Mo functional. Here, we address de-orbitalization of that new sregTM into a pure density functional. We summarize the failures of the Mejía-Rodríguez and Trickey de-orbitalization strategy [Phys. Rev. A 96, 052512 (2017)] when used with both versions. We discuss how those failures apparently arise in the so-called z′ indicator function and in substitutes for the reduced density Laplacian in the parent functionals. Then, we show that the sregTM functional can be de-orbitalized somewhat well with a rather peculiarly parameterized version of the previously used deorbitalizer. We discuss, briefly, a de-orbitalization that works in the sense of reproducing error patterns but that apparently succeeds by cancelation of major qualitative errors associated with the de-orbitalized indicator functions α and z, hence, is not recommended. We suggest that the same issue underlies the earlier finding of comparatively mediocre performance of the de-orbitalized Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–Scuseri functional. Our work demonstrates that the intricacy of such two-indicator functionals magnifies the errors introduced by the Mejía-Rodríguez and Trickey de-orbitalization approach in ways that are extremely difficult to analyze and correct.