Abstract
In 2005, the European Commission advocated for a more economic approach to enforcing competition laws. The sole criterion for assessing the lawfulness of a market practice should be the appraisal of its net effect on consumer welfare. The Court of Justice was reluctant to adopt such an approach until its 2017 Intel Judgment. Its endorsement—which is debatable insofar as the judgment may give rise to different interpretations—may appear paradoxical in that it is concomitant with a sharp challenge to the consumer welfare criterion in the United States. The purpose of this article is to retrace the history of this criterion, particularly its adoption in the context of EU competition law. We aim to show that the criticisms of the effects-based approach can be addressed not by moving away from the consumer welfare criterion but by integrating it into a broader perspective that also takes into account the protection of the competition process itself.
Publisher
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
Reference83 articles.
1. Amato, G. (1997). Antitrust and the bounds of power - the dilemma of liberal democracy in the history of the market. Hart Publishing.
2. Berk, G. (2009). Louis D. Brandeis and the Making of Regulated. Competition, 1900-1932. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581205
3. Blair, R. D. & Sokol, D. D. (2012). The Rule of Reason and the Goals of Antitrust. Antitrust Law Journal: An Economic Approach, 78(2), 471-504. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2039337
4. Bork, R. H. (1966). Legislative Intent and the Policy of the Sherman Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 9, 7-48.https://doi.org/10.1086/466617
5. Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox - A Policy at War with Itself. The Free Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献