Affiliation:
1. University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE
Abstract
In a fast-paced evolved modern world, scientific literacy (SL) is essential for an individual to interact and make decisions about science-related issues. A scientifically literate person should have not only scientific knowledge, but also motivations and beliefs toward science. The purpose of current research is the examination and comparison of pre-service teachers’ and primary school students’ motivations and beliefs towards science. There were 787 participants comprising the research sample. A three-factor structure was verified through statistical techniques such as exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Moreover, the reliability coefficient is considered acceptable. According to descriptive analyses and statistical significance tests, both groups show medium to quite positive perceptions toward the value of science and science self-efficacy. Additionally, there is no statistically significant difference in both groups’ performances regarding these categories. Regarding personal epistemology, students achieve a statistically significantly better performance than the teachers. However, both groups’ scores were assessed as moderate to low. Suggestions for further research about primary school students’ and teachers’ SL motivations and beliefs are presented.
Reference83 articles.
1. Aktan, S. (2019). Investigation of classroom teaching, self-efficacy and motivation in social studies classrooms. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 639-656.
2. Alpaslan, M. M. (2017). The relationship between personal epistemology and self-regulation among Turkish elementary school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1108277
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
4. Barger, M. M., Perez, T., Canelas, D. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2018). Constructivism and personal epistemology development in undergraduate chemistry students. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.006
5. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献