Comparison of Four Procedures to Detect Listeria spp. in Foods

Author:

HEISICK JUDY E.1,HARRELL FANNIE M.1,PETERSON EUGENE H.1,MCLAUGHLIN SALLIE1,WAGNER DEAN E.1,WESLEY IRENE V.1,BRYNER JOHN1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Microbiological Investigations, Food and Drug Administration, Minneapolis. MN 55401 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 50010

Abstract

A comparison was made of four procedures to detect Listeria spp. in two food categories. The study comprised 309 assays, 71 on milk from both infected and uninfected cows, and 238 on ten types of fresh vegetables. A sample was considered positive if it could be detected by at least a single method and if isolates could be confirmed as Listeria spp. The procedures detected 98–100% of the positive milk samples. Recovery from vegetable samples ranged from 45 to 86%, probably because of low levels of Listeria spp. in the presence of mixed flora. The ELISA procedure of the Organon Teknika® corporation detected 68% of the 44 positive vegetable samples; the GENE-TRAK®DNA probe, 45%; the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) culture procedure, 75%; and the FDA probe procedure, 86%. Recovery was higher with LiCl-phenylethanol-moxalactam agar (FDA probe procedure) than with modified McBride Agar (FDA culture procedure).

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Cited by 45 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3