Comparative Study of a Colorimetric DNA Hybridization Method and Conventional Culture Procedures for the Detection of Listeria spp. in Foods

Author:

BOTTARI DONNA A.1,EMMETT CONSTANCE D.1,NICHOLS CHRISTINE E.1,WHIPPIE KEVAN D.1,RODRIGUEZ DAVID1,DURBIN GREGORY W.1,KEOUGH KAREN M.1,GROODY E. PATRICK1,MOZOLA MARK A.1,REYNOLDS GWEN N.1

Affiliation:

1. GENE-TRAK Systems. 31 New York Ave. Framingham. MA 01701 USA0

Abstract

A colorimetric DNA hybridization-based assay has been evaluated against two conventional culture methods (FDA and USDA) for detection of Listeria spp. in dairy, Meat, and seafood products. A total of 1,300 samples representing 15 food types were analyzed in parallel by both the DNA hybridization (DNAH) and culture methods (FDA for dairy products and seafoods, USDA for meats). Samples included inoculated and naturally contaminated products and uninoculated controls. Fifteen strains representing five species of Listeria were used as inocula. Of 660 dairy and seafood samples tested, the FDA culture method detected 354 positives and the DNAH method detected 393 positives, 391 of which were confirmed. The DNAH method was statistically equivalent to the FDA method for eight of the nine products tested. In some trials, the DNAH method detected more positives than the FDA method for cheddar cheese and in some cases these differences were statistically significant. Of 540 meat samples tested, the USDA culture method detected 261 positives and the DNAH method detected 378 positives, all of which were confirmed. The DNAH method was statistically equivalent to the culture method for three of the six products tested. In some trials, the DNAH method detected more positives than the USDA method for roast beef, hot dogs, and fermented sausage. In some cases, these differences were statistically significant. Of 100 naturally contaminated products tested, the DNAH method detected 86 positives and the culture methods detected 84 positives. The DNAH method was statistically equivalent to the culture methods for these samples. The DNAH method gives a negative result 48 h after the start of sample enrichment, whereas the FDA and USDA methods require 3 to 4 days or longer. It is concluded that the DNAH assay is a rapid, accurate, and objective alternative to the culture procedures for the detection of Listeria spp. in foods.

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3