Affiliation:
1. 1Commonwealth of Virginia, Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services, Richmond, Virginia 23219, USA
2. 2Department of Forensic Science, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky 40475, USA
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate the plausibility and accuracy of commercially available on-site immunoassay urinalysis kits for the screening of compounds of interest within food matrices. In conjunction with this study, a sensitive, robust, and reproducible analytical method, utilizing solid-phase extraction liquid chromatography/quadrupole ion trap/time-of-flight mass spectrometry for confirmation analysis, was developed. The food matrices analyzed were tomato juice, apple juice, milk, beer, white wine, ground beef, powdered milk, and all-purpose flour. Compounds fortified into the food matrices included heroin, phencyclidine, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine, imipramine, doxepin, nitrazepam, diazepam, oxazepam, temazepam, alprazolam, flunitrazepam, clonazepam, and lorazepam. Standard curves were prepared for each matrix from 10 to 500 ng/ml for each analyzed compound. All liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry samples were fortified with 20 μl of deuterated internal standard at 90 ng/ml. Quality control standards were prepared at 20 and 400 ng/ml, and >90% were within 2 SD of the mean for each analyte. The test kits were found to produce up to 85% of the expected results based on concentration levels of adulterants (i-Screen in milk). This study shows that lateral-flow immunoassay test kits are plausible as a rapid, accurate, and reliable screening method in the event of adulteration of the food supply.
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献