Affiliation:
1. Laboratório de Inspeção de Produtos de Origem Animal, Departamento de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais 36570-900, Brazil
2. Laboratório de Inspeção e Controle de Qualidade de Alimentos e Água, Universidade Federal do Paraná, R. Pioneiro 2153 Jardim Dallas, Palotina, Paraná 85950-000, Brazil
3. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-5824 [L.A.N.])
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Listeria monocytogenes contamination was assessed in different steps of a pork production chain. Ten lots of pigs were sampled at termination barns, at slaughter (after bleeding, after buckling, after evisceration, and after final washing), at processing (knives, deboning tables, and employees' hands), and of end products (ribs, shoulder, ham, and sausage). All samples (n = 670) were subjected to L. monocytogenes detection, and the obtained isolates (n = 18, identified as Listeria spp.) were characterized by their biochemical characteristics, serogroups, virulence genes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles, antibiotic resistances (ampicillin, penicillin, gentamicin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim), and adhesion abilities. The results revealed the low occurrence of Listeria spp. in the evaluated pork production chain. However, four tested sausage samples (40%) were positive for Listeria spp., with L. monocytogenes identified in two (20%) of these samples. Ten isolates were identified as L. monocytogenes (eight from serogroup 1/2a or 3a and two from serogroup 4b, 4d, or 4e): all isolates were also positive for the virulence-related genes hlyA, iap, plcA, actA, inlA, inlB, inlC, and inlJ and susceptible to the tested antibiotics. One sausage sample was contaminated by both serogroups 1/2a or 3a and 4b, 4d, or 4e. Isolates from serogroup 1/2a or 3a obtained during visits 5 and 6 presented distinct genetic profiles by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, indicating that contamination may come from different sources. The adhesion potential exhibited by Listeria spp. isolates (n = 18) ranged from weak (serogroup 4b, 4d, or 4e) to moderate (L. innocua and L. monocytogenes serogroup 1/2a or 3a). Despite the low occurrence of L. monocytogenes, pathogenic serogroups were detected in sausages, demanding control measures by the industry.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference39 articles.
1. Borucki,
M. K.,
and
CallD. R.
2003.
Listeria monocytogenes serotype identification by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
41:
5537–
5540.
2. Botteldoorn,
N.,
Heyndrickx
M.,
Rijpens
N.,
Grijspeerdt
K.,
and
HermanL.
2003.
Salmonella on pig carcasses: positive pigs and cross contamination in the slaughterhouse.
J. Appl. Microbiol.
95:
891–
903.
3. Cabanes,
D.,
Dehoux
P.,
Dussurget
O.,
Frangeul
L.,
and
CossartP.
2002.
Surface proteins and the pathogenic potential of Listeria monocytogenes.
Trends Microbiol.
10:
238–
245.
4. Camargo,
A. C.,
Lafisca
A.,
Cossi
M. V. C.,
Lanna
F. G. P. A.,
Dias
M. R.,
de Arruda Pinto
P. S.,
and
NeroL. A.
2014.
Low occurrence of Listeria monocytogenes on bovine hides and carcasses in Minas Gerais state, Brazil: molecular characterization and antimicrobial resistance.
J. Food Prot.
77:
1148–
1152.
5. Camargo,
A. C.,
Woodward
J. J.,
Call
D. R.,
and
NeroL. A.
2017.
Listeria monocytogenes in food-processing facilities, food contamination, and human listeriosis: the Brazilian scenario.
Foodborne Pathog. Dis.
14:
623–
636.