Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
2. Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Demand and consumption of goat meat is increasing in the United States due to an increase in ethnic populations that prefer goat meat. As ruminant animals, goats are known reservoirs for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and proper handling, especially during slaughter, is imperative to reduce the likelihood of carcass and meat contamination. However, the majority of antimicrobial intervention studies during the slaughter of ruminant species have focused on beef, highlighting the need for validation studies targeting small ruminants, such as goats, during slaughter and chilling procedures. The objective of this research was to evaluate 4.5% lactic acid (LA; pH 2.1), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 400 ppm; pH 4.7), a hydrochloric and citric acid blend (Citrilow [CL]; pH 1.2), 5% levulinic acid plus 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (LVA+SDS; pH 2.60), and a nontreated control (CON) for their efficacy in reducing STEC surrogates and their effect on carcass color from slaughter through 24-h chill. Fifteen goat carcasses across three replications were inoculated with a five-strain cocktail (ca. 5 log CFU/cm2 attachment), containing rifampin-resistant surrogate E. coli (BAA-1427, BAA-1428, BAA-1429, BAA-1430, and BAA-1431) and were randomly assigned to an antimicrobial treatment. Antimicrobials were applied prechill and 24 h postchill. Mean log reductions achieved after prechill treatment with LA, PAA, CL, and LVA+SDS were 2.00, 1.86, 2.26, and 1.90 log CFU/cm2, respectively. Antimicrobial treatment after the 24-h chilling, resulted in additional reductions of surrogate E. coli by 0.99, 1.03, 1.94, and 0.47 log CFU/cm2 for LA, PAA, CL, and LVA+SDS, respectively. Antimicrobial treatments did not impact goat carcass objective color (L* and a*), except for b*. The antimicrobials tested in this study were able to effectively reduce surrogate STEC populations during slaughter and subsequent chilling without compromising carcass color.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference32 articles.
1. AMSA meat color measurement guidelines;American Meat Science Association,2012
2. Evaluation of the Citrilow™ antimicrobial at various pH values for reducing the natural microbial load on beef sub-primals;Beers;Int. J. Meat Sci,2011
3. Belk, K. E.
2001. Beef decontamination technologies. Beef facts. National Cattlemen's Beef Association, Research and Technical Services, Centennial, CO. Available at: http://www.beef.org. Accessed 27 November 2016.
4. Use of hot water for beef carcass decontamination;Castillo;J. Food Prot,1998
5. Comparison of water wash, trimming, and combined hot water and lactic acid treatments for reducing bacteria of fecal origin on beef carcasses;Castillo;J. Food Prot,1998