Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
2. Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Ruminants are natural reservoirs of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and the STEC can be easily transferred to carcasses during the conversion of animals to meat. Three experiments were conducted to validate the efficacy of lactic acid (LA; 4%), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 300 ppm), and hot water (HW; 80°C) for their individual or combined abilities to reduce STEC surrogates on bob veal carcasses pre- and postchill and through fabrication. In experiment 1, hot carcasses (n = 9) were inoculated with a five-strain cocktail (ca. 8 log CFU/mL) containing rifampin-resistant surrogate E. coli (BAA-1427, BAA-1428, BAA-1429, BAA-1430, and BAA-1431) and then treated with HW, LA, or PAA. Carcasses were then chilled (0 ± 1°C; 24 h) and split in half, and each side was treated with either LA or PAA. In experiment 2, hot carcasses (n = 3) were inoculated and chilled (24 h). After 24 h, the carcasses were split, and each side was treated with either LA or PAA. For experiment 3, carcasses (n = 3) were chilled for 24 h, split, inoculated, and treated with either LA or PAA. After chilling, carcasses from all three experiments were fabricated to subprimals and the cut surfaces were sampled to determine the translocation of bacteria. Experiment 1 showed that LA+LA was the most effective (P ≤ 0.05) treatment for reducing surrogate E. coli on veal. In experiments 2 and 3, LA and PAA were similar (P > 0.05) in their abilities to reduce E. coli on chilled veal carcasses. In experiments 1 and 2, all antimicrobial treatments resulted in undetectable levels (<0.2 log CFU/cm2) of surrogate E. coli on cut surfaces after fabrication, whereas low levels (1.7 and 1.0 log CFU/cm2 for LA and PAA, respectively) were observed in experiment 3. Of the antimicrobial interventions utilized, LA was more effective for reducing STEC surrogate populations on veal carcasses, pre- and/or postchill.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Bosilevac,
J. M.,
Wang
R.,
Luedtke
B. E.,
Hinkley
S.,
Wheeler
T. L.,
and
KoohmaraieM.
2017.
Characterization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli on veal hides and carcasses.
J. Food Prot.
80:
136–
145.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-247
2. Bosilevac,
J. M.,
Wang
R.,
Luedtke
B. E.,
Wheeler
T. L.,
and
KoohmaraieM.
2016.
Contamination revealed by indicator microorganism levels during veal processing.
J. Food Prot.
79:
1341–
1347.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-572
3. Cabrera-Diaz,
E.,
Moseley
T. M.,
Lucia
L. M.,
Dickson
J. S.,
Castillo
A.,
and
AcuffG. R.
2009.
Fluorescent protein-marked Escherichia coli Biotype I strains as surrogates for enteric pathogens in validation of beef carcass interventions.
J. Food Prot.
72:
295–
303.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.2.295
4. Castillo,
A.,
Lucia
L. M.,
Roberson
D. B.,
Stevenson
T. H.,
Mercado
I.,
and
AcuffG. R.
2001.
Lactic acid sprays reduce bacterial pathogens on cold beef carcass surfaces and in subsequently produced ground beef.
J. Food Prot.
64:
58–
62.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-64.1.58
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
2012.
National Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) surveillance overview.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dfwed/PDFs/national-stec-surveillance-overiew-508c.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2018.